Montana 1948 Blog 2

I can easily say that Montana 1948 was my favorite book out of the five that we read this year. Between the plot, character development and conflicts in the book, I was completely intrigued. David, the main character, was a very strong willed and curious child. He knew the importance of family values and that his mom and dad were there for him no matter what. The conflict with Uncle Frank was the most interesting part of the book. I was constantly wondering what would happen to him and if he really did what he was accused of. Every time I thought the conflict was solved, something else was thrown in there. The molesting of the Indians was solved, yet then David saw him coming out of the house the day that Marie died. I was definitely pulling for Wes, David's dad, to solve the crime and arrest Uncle Frank. What he did was wrong in so many ways and showed how the Indians were completely discriminated against in that time period. I particularly enjoyed the fact that the book was written in past tense, as David was remembering the times that happened. Then in the Epilogue David explained his current life as an adult with a wife and kids. I noticed that David's character developed greatly from the situation with Uncle Frank. By the end of the book David realized that you cannot trust everyone and the importance of his family.

Montana 1948 Post 1

I am about 60 pages into Montana 1948 and I absolutely LOVE it. Everything about the book, from the plot to the writing to the characters catches my interest. David, the main character, is narrating the story from his point of view. He is now much older and is telling the story from the past. I am so excited to see where the story goes involving the family's housekeeper, Marie. She is currently very sick and the doctor has no idea how to treat her case because Marie won't let him do a full exam. The doctor, David's father's brother, is known for molesting Indian women. This is another aspect of the story that I am very interested in knowing what happens. Overall this book is my favorite out of the 5 books we have been assigned to read this year and it's nice to end on such a strong note.

Mango Street (Post 2)

I am sad to say that after finishing The House On Mango Street, I am not very pleased. The story was written in short little chapters, sometimes only 2 paragraphs long, which I did not enjoy. I failed to see the connection between everything until the very end, which made the book hard to read through. To me, it seemed as though I was just reading random things about random character's in Esperanza's life. I can barely remember more then 2 of the characters names because there were so many at random parts of the books.
Yet, at the same time, I can definitely see the message that this book was trying to show it's readers. It displayed very deep character growth for Esperanza, as she grew from a child into a young lady. Esperanza slowly began to realize that even if she doesn't have the perfect house on the perfect street with the perfect clothes, her life is still important. It is not about how you live but about the people you live your life with and the lessons you learned. It took three random old ladies to make Esperanza realize that no matter where she went in her life, she always has to remember her past. That even if she moves across the country, she will always come back to home and remember her childhood, the good and the bad.
Overall, the story had it's up and downs. I would name it a top favorite or anything, but not the worst thing I have ever read. Though the writing style took away a lot of my interest, the lesson at the end brought back a good amount.

Mango Street Post 1

I'm barely 30 pages in the book, but usually when that far someone can form an opinion on what they are reading. Yet, with this book.. I have nothing. I don't like it, but I don't hate it. Personally I'm just confused, I have no idea where the book is going or what it is about. I just keep reading short easy chapters about Esperanza's life that barely have anything to do with each other. But I'm not giving up yet, I'm just crossing my fingers that the book becomes a little more interesting or maybe makes more sense!? I think that from what I have read so far, it definitely has potential to be a good book. Slowly as the book goes on I'll probably learn more about where Esperanza's family came from and why they are at the state they are in right now.

Catcher: Second Post

I just finished "The Catcher in the Rye" and honestly, I haven't decided whether I liked it or not. As I said in the last post, I enjoyed the writing style. The author, J.D. Salinger, used repetition a lot, and it really interested me. I also liked the way Holden would talk, using curses and what not.. it seemed more realistic then the way most books portray guys his age. But the first thought that came to my head when I put the book down was .. "What was the point?" I am still trying to figure out the plot to this story, or the climax.. or any of the normal stages a book should have. There was no distinct beginning, middle and end.. it was just all bunched together into one 214 page story. I kinda liked it though. It wasn't like the author was trying to follow any writing rules or anything.. he was just writing the story because it appealed to him. Holden's life really appealed to me too. I kept forgetting he was only a 17 year old, rather then practically 25. He was so immature in some ways, involving school and education, but very mature in others. He handled situations very well, and no matter what he knew that his family always came first. He went through a lot in those few days alone in the city, and I think it completely opened his eyes. If I had to predict what happened in his life after the story ended, I would say he applied himself in school and succeeded in getting a job and having a nice life. I loved Phoebe's character probably the most. Even though the reader only meets her in the last few chapters, I find her very interesting and realistic. A little girl always looks up to her older brother, and stays by his side no matter what. She was stubborn, fun and exciting all in one. All of the characters in this book seemed real to me.. not like some made up fictional characters you see in other books. So, in conclusion, I would say I pretty much enjoyed "The Catcher in the Rye" a lot, despite the lack of plot and/or climax. It definitely lived up to the expectations that many people before me have set for it.

*Sorry, I know this is a mess and my thoughts are all over the place(:

Catcher: First Post

When I first began to read "The Catcher and The Rye" I was surprisingly intrigued. I thought because of the boring cover, that this would be a boring book. Yet, I have heard about this novel for years and how amazing it is. Even though I am only about 3 chapters into this novel, and there I really have no idea where it is going.. I have a feeling I will enjoy this book. Holden, the main character, has just gotten kicked out of Pency, an "amazing" private school. He pretty much just doesn't care about his life or where he is going in it, but his teachers try and get the most that they can out of him. I am really interested to see how Holden lives his life and what happens to him when he actually leaves the school. I also noticed how repetitive the book is so far. The characters repeat what they are saying constantly, as if to emphasize what is going on in the novel. I enjoy the way that this author writes his books.

The Bell Jar: Post 2

After finishing the novel, The Bell Jar, I was very happy with it. I loved the way that one second Esther is a happy woman living in New York City and then the next second she is being sent to various asylums. Though I was expecting that Esther was going be insane because of the summary in the back of the book, the way it happened still caught me by surprise. I found it very interesting that no matter how many times Esther tried to commit suicide, she was never able to go through with it. From drowning, to cutting herself, to trying to hang herself.. it seemed as though it was never meant to be. It was almost as though there was some unknown force holding Esther back, and keeping her alive.
One thing I didn't completely like about the novel, was how the author changed from past to present. It usually took me until I was reading for 2 or 3 paragraphs of the part of the novel to understand when the event was taking place. There was no definite show of when the story was taking place at any time.
In relation to the name of the novel, The Bell Jar, it took until the last couple of chapters to learn what the title meant. Esther was trapped in a "bell jar" during the time of her life in the asylums. In this bell jar, Esther was kept in her own world, with no new air to breath. The bell jar was making Esther suicidal because she had no way of escaping the boundaries of the jar. I really enjoyed the way the author used the title in the story.
In conclusion I am very happy with the whole novel. I was constantly captivated and wanting to read more. Even though there is no definite ending, I predict that Esther finally goes back to the life that she used to have. It makes the book more interesting when the reader has to make up their own ending in their head.